Pre-treatment fear of disease progression profiles and psychological resilience among patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms

Background Fear of disease progression (FoP) is a common psychological concern among patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs). However, heterogeneity in FoP and the role of psychological resilience before treatment remain insufficiently understood. Methods In this cross-sectional study, patients with UIAs scheduled for endovascular treatment were recruited. FoP was assessed using the Fear of Progression Questionnaire–Short Form (FoP-Q-12), and psychological resilience was measured with the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-25). Latent profile analysis (LPA) was conducted to identify distinct FoP profiles. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression followed by multinomial logistic regression were used to examine factors associated with profile membership. Results Five distinct FoP profiles were identified: Minimal Fear–Good Adjustment, Mild Emotionally Elevated Fear, Moderate Emotionally Reactive Fear, Moderate Functionally Concerned Fear, and High Pervasive Fear. Multinomial logistic regression showed that higher psychological resilience—particularly the tenacity dimension—was associated with lower odds of belonging to the Mild Emotionally Elevated Fear, Moderate Emotionally Reactive Fear, and Moderate Functionally Concerned Fear profiles, compared with the Minimal Fear–Good Adjustment profile. No significant association was observed between tenacity and the High Pervasive Fear profile. Sensitivity analyses using alternative resilience indicators yielded consistent results. Conclusion Among patients with UIAs prior to endovascular treatment, FoP exhibits marked heterogeneity. Psychological resilience, especially tenacity, is differentially associated with specific FoP profiles. These findings support the value of profile-based psychological assessment to inform targeted psychosocial support during treatment planning.