This document outlines the finite audit artifacts in the transcript-to-notebook pipeline, indicating design for audit execution and reproducibility.
This note specifies the finite audit artifacts required to make the “verifiable finite” layer of the transcript-to-notebook pipeline executable by third parties. It introduces no new theory and does not re-derive Stage II or Stage III. Instead, it gives a reproducible specification for the two finite audits already singled out by the pipeline: the K(2) injection audit and the template × LocalContextType audit underlying Lemma R′ / H-LCT. The document fixes the relevant output schemas, PASS/FAIL rules, evidence-pack format, logging conventions, and hash-manifest discipline, so that an auditor can rerun the procedures and compare byte-level artifacts. All claims remain within the declared interface model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jonatan Muñoz Rodriguez (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: