Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Descriptive study identifies self-management challenges in primary care, suggesting a need for better collaboration.
At the 13 participating Regional Health Agencies, we identified 4,922 SMI programmes among which 18% (n = 889) were developed in primary care settings and 5.5% (n = 271) in PCPs. Among the 127 forms on SMI programmes at PCPs (2.6%), multi-professional PCPs (57.5%, n = 73) and healthcare centres (25.9%, n = 33) were the most represented. All programmes had a coordinator (mostly general practitioners, 34.7%, n = 24) among whom 69.7% (n = 69) were trained in coordination. The self-management team included a mean of 8.1 (5.5) primary care providers. The main themes were diabetes (34.6%, n = 44), diabetes and cardiovascular diseases (15.6%, n = 20), and cardiovascular disease (10.2%, n = 13). In France, self-management programmes in PCPs are still rare, lack a multimorbidity approach, and are carried out mainly in PCPs with inter-professional collaboration. A qualitative study to identify the barriers and levers to SMI programmes in PCPs may be particularly relevant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Allory et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: