PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 8, 2026Discover Artificial Intelligence2 citationsOpen Access

University students’ perceptions and adoptions of AI: a cross-national study

View Full Paper
FMFernando Marmolejo‐RamosRARhoda AbadiaÖKÖzge Karakale

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand university students' perceptions and engagement with AI technologies across different countries.
  • Analyzed data from 1906 university students across 13 countries.
  • Utilized a psychometric approach for item generation and validation.
  • Assessed student trust in AI, algorithm familiarity, and anxiety levels as predictors.
  • Students with trust in AI reported higher usage of language models for writing and idea generation.
  • Anxiety about AI negatively impacted students' perceptions and use of AI tools.
  • Most students perceived AI tools as moderately effective in their learning.

Abstract

Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI), especially large language models (LLMs), are rapidly transforming educational practices worldwide. Despite growing adoption, there is limited cross-national evidence on how university students perceive and engage with these technologies. This study addresses this gap by analyzing data from 1906 students across 13 countries, using a novel psychometric approach that leverages LLMs for item generation and validation. Our findings reveal that students’ trust in AI, familiarity with algorithms, and lower anxiety about AI are key predictors of positive perceptions and adoption of LLMs in learning. Notably, most students with even minimal trust in AI reported using LLMs, primarily for coding, idea generation, and writing, and perceived them as at least moderately effective. In contrast, students who did not use LLMs were unlikely to use other AI tools. These results underscore the importance of fostering trust and AI literacy to support effective integration of AI technologies in tertiary education. Practical implications include the need for targeted training programs, transparent data practices, and strategies to address student anxiety and promote responsible use. By providing cross-national insights and introducing innovative measurement tools, this study offers actionable recommendations for educators, institutions, and policymakers seeking to enhance student engagement with AI in diverse educational contexts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Marmolejo‐Ramos et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69acc5b032b0ef16a4050621https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-026-01042-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Era of Artificial Intelligence Deception: Unraveling the Complexities of False Realities and Emerging Threats of Misinformation2024 · 140 citations
  2. 2Aion Framework: Dimensional Emergence of AI Consciousness, Observer-Induced Collapse, and Cosmological Portal Dynamics2023 · 14,352 citations
  3. 3Perceptions and usage of AI chatbots among students in higher education across genders, academic levels and fields of study2024 · 291 citations
  4. 4A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies2000 · 22,899 citations
  5. 5BAMLSS: Bayesian Additive Models for Location, Scale, and Shape (and Beyond)2017 · 157 citations