This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Accurate river discharge estimation is fundamental for water resource management under increasingly variable hydrological conditions. While conventional in situ techniques remain hydrometric reference standards, their operational deployment is constrained by cost, accessibility, and limited spatial coverage. Advances in remote sensing and artificial intelligence (AI) have introduced non-contact discharge estimation frameworks based on image-derived observations. This systematic review, conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 reporting guidelines, examines the evolution of river discharge measurement methods between 2004 and 2024 through a structured two-stage design. An initial search in Web of Science and Scopus identified 2809 records, of which 249 were retained for first-stage synthesis. A focused second-stage screening isolated seven studies that directly integrate image-based data with machine learning or deep learning architectures for discharge estimation. The analysis reveals a methodological transition from instrument-based hydrometry toward computationally assisted, image-driven approaches. The retained studies employ close-range and satellite imagery combined with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Long Short-Term Memory networks (LSTMs), and related models. Although reported validation metrics indicate strong predictive capability under specific conditions, performance remains dependent on site-specific calibration and reference discharge records. Broader operational deployment requires improved transferability, uncertainty integration, and cross-basin validation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
González-Vergara et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: