Proposes a classification system to identify landslide failure modes, suggesting enhanced monitoring methods for disaster prevention.
Landslide disasters cause significant economic losses and casualties. Accurately identifying landslide failure modes is crucial for monitoring and early warning. This study proposes a general classification system of four failure modes. Based on 219 landslide cases collected from literature, the study uses slope angle, material, rock stratum structure, and dip angle as prediction indicators. Five machine learning algorithms are applied, with non-numerical indicators processed by one-hot encoding. A parameterization scheme with optimal effects is determined through comparisons. Adjusting neural network parameters shows that the CNN algorithm performs best, but it has limitations in distinguishing between buckling and toppling fracture plane sliding of cataclinal rock slopes due to overlapping data distribution and limited sample size. Overall, the research results landslide failure mode identification, providing a reference for enhancing monitoring and early warning capabilities. It offers practical significance and technical support for landslide disaster prevention and control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: