Analysis of AI-driven risk scores improves treatment decisions in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, suggesting better outcomes.
Background Survival remains heterogeneous in locally advancednasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) despite immunotherapy, highlighting the need for explainable artificial intelligence (AI) for risk-adapted care. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 249 patients with locally advanced NPC between 2018 and 2025. Patients were randomly split into a training cohort (70%) and a validation cohort (30%). A Cox–XGBoost survival modeling framework was developed using routinely available clinical variables to generate individualized risk scores and classify patients into low- and high-risk groups. Model discrimination was assessed using time-dependent ROC analysis. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) was applied to provide transparent, feature-level and patient-level interpretations of predicted risk. Results Univariable Cox regression identified age, tumor grade, and N stage as significant prognostic factors. In the training cohort, the XGBoost-derived risk score robustly separated low- and high-risk groups, with significantly prolonged survival in the low-risk group (P < 0.001). In the validation cohort, the AUCs for predicting 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS were 0.784, 0.765, and 0.725, respectively. SHAP analyses consistently highlighted age as the strongest driver of predicted risk, followed by N stage and tumor grade; older age and advanced nodal disease were associated with higher predicted mortality risk. Conclusion An interpretable XGBoost-based survival model built from routine clinical variables provides clinically meaningful risk stratification for locally advanced NPC patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: