Evaluates a 25 Hz markerless motion capture system for tracking basketball movements, suggesting acceptable accuracy for training use.
Markerless motion capture (MMC) provides a non-invasive alternative for motion analysis; however, its validity at the standard frame rate of 25 Hz commonly used in broadcast and surveillance applications remains to be established. This study evaluated the performance of a 25 Hz multi-camera MMC workflow using consumer-grade cameras for capturing basketball-specific movements. Three highly trained male athletes completed seven tasks, including sprinting and simulated sport-specific skills, while being synchronously recorded by six MMC cameras (DJI Action 5 Pro, 25 fps) and a 10-camera Vicon system (25 Hz). Kinematic data were processed using an RTMDet–RTMPose pipeline and low-pass filtered at 6 Hz. Waveform validity was assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) and the root mean square error (RMSE). The displacement magnitudes of 12 joints showed excellent agreement (r = 0.916–0.994; median nRMSE = 0.54–1.32%), indicating robust trajectory reconstruction. In contrast, agreement decreased for derivative variables: velocity (r = 0.583–0.867) and acceleration (r = 0.232–0.677) were highly sensitive to the low sampling rate and numerical differentiation. Although a 25 Hz configuration is insufficient for high-precision impact analysis, it provides acceptable accuracy for macroscopic displacement tracking and external-load quantification in resource-constrained training environments. Future optimization should prioritize temporal synchronization to improve the reliability of derivative variables.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: