Key result
TyG, TG/HDL-C, and METS-IR are independently and equally associated with SLVD in type 2 diabetes.
Why the study?
The predictive value of TG/HDL-C and METS-IR for subclinical left ventricular dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus remained unclear, with no comparative analysis against the TyG index.
Do non-insulin-based insulin resistance indices (TyG index, TG/HDL-C, and METS-IR) predict subclinical left ventricular dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Observational (n=221)
Single-blind
No
Do non-insulin-based insulin resistance indices (TyG index, TG/HDL-C, and METS-IR) predict subclinical left ventricular dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Odds Ratio: 4.27 (95% CI 2.62–6.95)
p-value: p=<0.001
Non-insulin-based insulin resistance indices (TyG, TG/HDL-C, and METS-IR) are effective and comparable surrogate markers for identifying subclinical left ventricular dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Routine IR indices may identify subclinical LV dysfunction in T2DM; extends their surrogate role but leaves open prospective validation.
Current research indicates that novel non-insulin-based insulin resistance indicators—including the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (TG/HDL-C), and Metabolic Score for Insulin Resistance (METS-IR)—are closely associated with cardiovascular disease risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Notably, the TyG index demonstrates significant correlation with subclinical left ventricular dysfunction (SLVD), making it a potential biomarker for early detection of SLVD in T2DM patients. However, the predictive value of TG/HDL-C and METS-IR in this context remains unclear, and no comparative analysis of their predictive efficacy has been conducted. The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the predictive value of these three indices for SLVD in T2DM patients. A total of 221 hospitalized patients with T2DM from the Department of Endocrinology, Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University), between June 2024 and February 2025, were included. Participants were categorized into SLVD (left ventricular global longitudinal strain, GLS < 18%) and non-SLVD (GLS ≥ 18%) groups based on speckle-tracking echocardiography. Univariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with SLVD. Multivariate logistic regression, adjusted for confounders, assessed the relationship of TyG index, TG/HDL-C, and METS-IR with SLVD. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to compare their predictive performance. Univariate analysis revealed that smoking, hypertension, BMI, creatinine, triglycerides, HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, TyG index, TG/HDL-C, and METS-IR were positively associated with SLVD, while gender and HDL-C were negatively correlated (all P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, TyG index, TG/HDL-C, and METS-IR remained significantly and positively associated with SLVD (all P < 0.001). ROC analysis showed AUCs of 0.785, 0.798, and 0.819 for TyG index, TG/HDL-C, and METS-IR, respectively, with no significant differences in predictive value according to Delong’s test (P > 0.05). TyG index, TG/HDL-C, and METS-IR are significantly associated with SLVD in T2DM patients and demonstrate good predictive performance. These indices are valuable for clinical application, especially in primary care settings, though no significant difference in predictive efficacy was observed among them.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhong et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=221). TyG index, TG/HDL-C, and METS-IR vs. Lower index values was evaluated on Subclinical left ventricular dysfunction (GLS < 18%) (OR 4.27, 95% CI 2.62-6.95, p=<0.001). The TyG index, TG/HDL-C, and METS-IR were significantly associated with subclinical left ventricular dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes, demonstrating comparable predictive AUCs of 0.785, 0.798, and 0.819, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: