Ecological momentary assessment reveals illness intrusiveness mediates activity disruption and life satisfaction in adults with type 1 diabetes, suggesting important psychological impacts.
Illness intrusiveness is a psychological process reflecting the perceived impact of illness-related disruptions on daily life in chronic conditions. Type 1 diabetes (T1D) disrupts daily activities through symptoms, self-care demands, and device use, yet little is known about how these disruptions shape psychosocial well-being. This study examined activity disruptions in adults with T1D using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and tested whether illness intrusiveness mediates the relationship between activity disruptions and life satisfaction. A total of 196 adults with T1D completed 14 days of momentary activity disruption assessments and follow-up surveys assessing illness intrusiveness and life satisfaction. On average, participants reported disruptions in 11% of momentary daily activities, with notable variation across activity types, racial/ethnic groups, and treatment regimens. Activity disruption significantly predicted greater illness intrusiveness (β = 0.33, p < 0.001), which in turn predicted lower life satisfaction (β = -0.51, p < 0.001). Mediation analysis revealed that illness intrusiveness fully mediated the relationship when adjusted for income. Subtype analyses showed that device-related (indirect effect: β = -0.12, p < 0.001) and symptom-related disruptions (indirect effect: β = -0.12, p = 0.01) were fully mediated, whereas self-care disruptions were not associated with life satisfaction. Findings highlight the value of capturing real-time activity disruptions and suggest that illness intrusiveness may be a key explanatory mechanism linking activity disruption and psychosocial outcomes. Device burden and socioeconomic context emerged as factors shaping these relationships.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: