Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conceptual engineering proposes iterative adoption and refinement of ethical frameworks, indicating a pathway for knowledge practices.
Mollema’s reframing of my proposal as conceptual engineering is illuminating, and his emphasis on conceptual ethics is valuable. However, I argue that the Apt Curation Model (ACM) already provides substantial conceptual-ethical justification through its preservation of epistemic responsibility and compatibility with existing intellectual practices. Rather than demanding comprehensive conceptual ethics before adoption, we should recognize conceptual engineering as iterative: provisional adoption, practical testing, and refinement based on experience. This constructive exchange advances our understanding of both the ACM’s strengths and the legitimate questions requiring further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tiegüe Vieira Rodrigues (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: