PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026European Journal of Agronomy2 citationsOpen Access

Managing species dominance in cereal-legume intercrop systems

View Full Paper
DKDavid KottelenbergJEJochem B. EversNAN. Anten

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore how species selection and spatial arrangements affect competitive dynamics in cereal-legume intercrops.
  • Conducted four field experiments from 2022 to 2024
  • Evaluated species combinations and mixing ratios
  • Analyzed spatial designs under herbicide-treated and weed-infested conditions
  • Measured light capture, weed suppression, and yield contributions
  • Cereals outperformed legumes in light capture and weed suppression
  • Reducing triticale from 50% to 25% balanced yields while maintaining weed suppression
  • Wider row spacing diminished triticale dominance but lowered yield and weed control
  • Under weed-infested conditions, triticale's dominance over faba bean decreased
  • Faba bean in alternated rows matched weed-free sole crop yields even in weed-infested conditions

Abstract

Weeds threaten crop productivity, while herbicide reliance raises environmental and health concerns. Intercropping offers an alternative for sustainable weed suppression, particularly when component crops differ in competitive ability. However, such differences can also lead to competitive dominance by the stronger crop species, reducing the yield of its companion. To design intercrops for enhanced weed suppression without compromising yield, it is important to understand how species selection and spatial arrangements influence competitive dynamics. We conducted four field experiments (2022–2024) evaluating how species combination, mixing ratio, and spatial design influence dominance in cereal–legume intercrops under herbicide-treated and weed-infested conditions. Cereals showed greater light capture and weed suppression compared to legumes, which generally aligned with cereal dominance in intercrops. Intercrop design can moderate cereal dominance, but with varying trade-offs. Reducing triticale proportion from 50% to 25% achieved balanced yield contributions from both species while maintaining weed suppression and overall productivity. Contrastingly, wider row spacing (37.5 cm vs 12.5 cm) reduced triticale dominance but at the cost of both yield advantages and weed suppression. Weed presence further moderated competitive dynamics: under weed-infested conditions, triticale’s dominance over faba bean decreased compared to weed-free (herbicide-treated) conditions, and faba bean performed better relative to its sole crop, indicating indirect facilitation through cereal–weed competition. On a land-area basis, faba bean in weed-infested alternate row intercrops with 50 or 75% faba bean matched weed-free sole crop productivity. These findings demonstrate that appropriately designed cereal-legume intercrops can suppress weeds effectively while maintaining productivity of both component crops. • Cereal-legume intercrop light interception resembles that of sole crop cereal. • High intercrop weed suppressiveness generally coincides with competitive dominance. • Reduced cereal proportion boosts legume yield without reducing weed suppression. • Weeds in intercrop indirectly facilitate faba bean by competing with cereals. • Thoughtful intercrop design can balance weed suppression with legume productivity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kottelenberg et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af949670916d39fea4b982https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2026.128065
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper