PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026BMC Public Health2 citationsOpen Access

Effect of physically active learning on physical activity levels in secondary school students: The ACTIVE CLASS Study

MGMaría González-PérezDCDaniel Camiletti‐MoirónARAbel Ruiz-Hermosa

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate how physically active learning (PAL) affects physical activity levels among secondary school students.
  • Randomised controlled trial design involving 113 students from four secondary schools.
  • Experimental group received 16 weeks of PAL lessons; control group continued traditional teaching.
  • Physical activity levels assessed using accelerometers over seven full days before and during the intervention.
  • Generalised linear mixed models analyzed differences in physical activity on PAL and non-PAL days.
  • Slight reduction in sedentary time and increase in moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) observed.
  • No significant differences in overall school-time physical activity levels post-intervention.
  • Significant increase in MVPA levels on the day of PAL lesson implementation (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.444).
  • Effects of PAL lessons do not persist throughout the full day or in weekly averages.

Abstract

Currently, school days are predominantly sedentary, which has negative implications for students’ physical and mental health. This study had two primary objectives: (i) to evaluate the effects of a physically active learning (PAL) intervention on physical activity (PA) levels during school hours; and (ii) to compare PA patterns during school hours and throughout the day between days with and without PAL sessions. As a secondary objective, the study analysed the intensity distribution of PA during PAL lessons. This randomised controlled trial included 113 students (7th -8th grade) from four secondary schools. The experimental group (n = 60) received a weekly PAL lesson for 16-weeks, while the control group (n = 53) continued with traditional teaching. PA and sedentary time were assessed by accelerometers over seven full-days before and during the last week of the intervention. Generalised linear mixed models were used to analyse the intervention’s effect on school PA and the differences in full-day and school-time PA on PAL vs. non-PAL day. Additionally, a descriptive analysis was performed to present the average distribution of PA intensities during PAL lessons. Although a slight reduction in sedentary time and an increase in moderate-vigorous PA (MVPA) were observed, no significant differences were found in PA levels during the overall school-time after the intervention, nor in full-day PA the day it was implemented. However, there was a significant effect on the day of implementation of a PAL lesson in MVPA levels (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.444) during school-time. PAL lessons can significantly increase MVPA during the school day, but these effects do not appear to persist throughout the full-day or in weekly school averages. Clinical Trials Registry: NCT05891054. Retrospectively registered. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05891054?cond=ACTIVE%20CLASS%20study&rank=1.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

González-Pérez et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af94c970916d39fea4bacdhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-26814-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper