PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence4 citationsOpen Access

Sequential neural operator transformer for high-fidelity surrogates of time-dependent non-linear partial differential equations

View Full Paper
QLQibang LiuWZWeiheng ZhongSKSeid Korić

Key Points

  • To develop an efficient model for predicting solutions of time-dependent nonlinear partial differential equations (PDEs).
  • Introduced Sequential Neural Operator Transformer (S-NOT) combining gated recurrent units and self-attention mechanisms.
  • Benchmarking against three datasets of real-world nonlinear material responses.
  • Compared performance with traditional operator networks.
  • S-NOT achieved prediction errors up to 4.5 times smaller than competing models.
  • Provided acceleration of 4 orders-of-magnitude compared to conventional finite element simulations.

Abstract

Partial differential equations (PDEs) are fundamental to modeling complex and nonlinear physical phenomena, but their numerical solution often requires significant computational resources, particularly when a large number of forward full solution evaluations are necessary, such as in design, optimization, sensitivity analysis, and uncertainty quantification. Recent advances in artificial intelligence – particularly operator learning – have enabled surrogate models that efficiently predict full-field PDE solutions; however, these models often struggle with accuracy and robustness when faced with highly nonlinear responses driven by sequential input functions. To address these challenges, we propose the Sequential Neural Operator Transformer (S-NOT), an architecture that combines gated recurrent units (GRUs) with the self-attention mechanism of transformers to address time-dependent, nonlinear PDEs. Unlike sequential-deep operator networks(S-DON), which use a dot product to merge encoded outputs from the branch and trunk sub-networks, S-NOT leverages attention to better capture intricate dependencies between sequential inputs and spatial query points. We benchmark S-NOT on three challenging datasets from real-world applications with plastic and thermo-viscoplastic highly nonlinear material responses: multiphysics steel solidification, a three dimensional (3D) lug specimen, and a dogbone specimen under temporal and path-dependent loadings. The results show that S-NOT yields prediction errors up to 4.5 times smaller than S-DON even for data outliers. Furthermore, S-NOT provides an acceleration of 4 orders-of-magnitude compared to traditional finite element method simulations, demonstrating its accuracy and robustness for drastically accelerating computational frameworks in scientific and engineering applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af94c970916d39fea4bad1https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2026.114428
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Transformers as Neural Operators for Solutions of Differential Equations with Finite Regularity2024
  2. 2Multi-scale time-stepping of Partial Differential Equations with transformers2024 · 16 citations
  3. 3Temporal neural operator for modeling time-dependent physical phenomena2025 · 18 citations
  4. 4Geometry Aware Operator Transformer as an Efficient and Accurate Neural Surrogate for PDEs on Arbitrary Domains2025
  5. 5Data-Efficient Time-Dependent PDE Surrogates: Graph Neural Simulators vs. Neural Operators2025