PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026Advanced Energy Materials6 citations

Addressing Bottlenecks to Achieve High‐Energy Sodium‐Ion Cells Using Tin Anodes

View Full Paper
PDParth DesaiHLHarshita LohaniYWYu Wang

Key Points

  • The aim is to identify and address challenges to achieve high-energy sodium-ion batteries using tin anodes.
  • Characterized glyme oxidation by-products affecting cell performance.
  • Utilized operando, ex situ, and post-mortem (electro)chemical analysis.
  • Explored protective SnO coating to reduce Sn-poisoning.
  • Implemented chemical traps like Na-metal and Na15Sn4 to manage cross-talk.
  • Achieved nearly 100% capacity retention over 200 cycles at C/5.
  • Mitigation strategies improved cell performance but did not completely prevent electrolyte oxidation.
  • Identified promising directions for future materials and electrolyte development.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Sodium‐ion batteries (NIBs), as a complementary energy storage device for Li‐ion batteries, are swiftly making their way into high‐power applications market. However, further progress in NIBs requires high energy density. This requires a shift from commonly used hard carbon (HC) anodes to alloy anodes such as Bi, Sn, Sb, etc., while overcoming the problems these materials pose, with regard to volume changes and interfacial reactivity. Although ether‐ and glyme‐based electrolytes mitigate anode reactivity, their poor oxidative stability limits compatibility with high‐voltage cathodes such as Na 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 2 F 3 (NVPF). Here, we identify glyme oxidation by‐products and detail their cross‐talk–induced poisoning in NVPF|Sn‐HC cells using operando, ex situ, and post‐mortem (electro)chemical characterizations. Based on these insights, we explore mitigation strategies (i) by reducing the Sn‐poisoning via protective SnO coating and (ii) arresting the cross‐talk phenomenon using a chemical trap such as Na‐metal, Na 15 Sn 4, or Na x C between the separators. Both approaches improve cell performance, albeit not fully suppressing electrolyte oxidation, with later enabling to reach near 100% capacity retention over 200 cycles at C/5, also giving some hope for achieving anode‐free Na‐ion cells. Although still present some shortcomings, these strategies offer promising directions for materials design, cell engineering, and electrolyte development toward high‐energy sodium‐ion batteries.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Desai et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af94c970916d39fea4bbf6https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202600009
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Addressing Bottlenecks to Achieve High-Energy Sodium-Ion Cells Using Tin Anodes or Anode-Free2025
  2. 2Tin Anode for High-Energy-Density Na-Ion Batteries2025
  3. 3Reaction Pathway and Performance Optimization of Tin Anodes for High‐Energy Sodium‐Ion Batteries2026
  4. 4Unlocking High‐Energy, High‐Power, and Long‐Life Sodium‐Ion Batteries Through Interfacial‐Functionalization‐Induced Sodium Rebalancing2026
  5. 5Synergistic Regulation of Nucleation and Interfacial Chemistry for Energy-Dense and Durable Anode-Free Na Batteries2026 · 4 citations