Observational study shows improved quality of life in breast cancer survivors, suggesting benefits of integrative care models.
Context: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy among women. Healthy lifestyle habits are associated with better quality of life (QoL), improved outcomes, survival, and prevention of secondary tumors. Aims: This pilot study evaluated the association of a comprehensive oncology unit (COU) with improvements in QoL among women with early-stage BC during follow-up, addressing the limited evidence on integrative care models and patient-reported outcomes. Settings and Design: Observational, repeated-measures study with 1-year prospective follow-up at a COU in a tertiary hospital in southern Spain. Recruitment occurred in 2022. Subjects and Methods: Data were collected at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months using validated questionnaires (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 items/BR23, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, and Mini Nutritional Assessment) to assess QoL, functional domains, and nutritional status. Participants were women with early-stage BC in follow-up who had attended the Unit’s programs. Statistical Analysis Used: Changes from baseline were analyzed using paired t -tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and longitudinal trends with repeated-measures ANOVA or Friedman tests as appropriate. Multivariable regression models identified predictors of QoL improvement. Analyses were performed using SPSS v24.0, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. Results: Of 237 recruited patients, 202 completed the study. Global QoL improved by a mean of +5.69 points at 12 months. Significant improvements were observed in functioning domains and body image, with reductions in fatigue, pain, and dyspnea. Conclusions: Participation in a COU was associated with significant improvements in QoL, supporting the role of integrative care models in optimizing survivorship outcomes in routine clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bayo-Calero et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: