This analysis evaluates the alignment of transformer models with global workspace theory, highlighting key disanalogies.
This paper examines whether transformer language models instantiate a functional analog to Global Workspace Theory (GWT). Through a structured literature review spanning mechanistic interpretability, sparse autoencoders, consciousness theory, and brain-transformer alignment studies (through 2025), four candidate structural mappings are evaluated: the residual stream as shared workspace, attention heads as broadcast specialists, superposition as unconscious processing substrate, and induction-head phase transitions as ignition dynamics. Two critical disanalogies are identified — absence of temporal recurrence and absence of recurrent broadcast — and a falsifiable experimental programme is specified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saman Rahbar (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: