Analysis reveals tensions in medical professionals' framing of female genital cosmetic procedures, indicating ethical complexities.
MPs frame FGCPs in terms of women's health and choice, helping to legitimise them as ethical care. These framings, however, obscure key tensions - between function and aesthetics, autonomy and clinical judgement, and medical versus cultural motivations. Examining these discursive dynamics reveals how FGCPs are made acceptable within a contested field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bavel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: