Comparative analysis evaluates energy efficiency for AI in smart cities, indicating hardware suitability implications.
The pervasive adoption of AI and AIoT applications at the network edge presents both opportunities and challenges for smart cities. With a focus on the energy efficiency of AI in urban environments, this paper provides a systematic comparative analysis of representative edge hardware platforms, i.e., embedded GPUs, FPGAs, and ultra-low-power microcontroller-/sensor-class devices, assessing their suitability for AI workloads in IoT-driven smart city infrastructures. The evaluation, based on direct characterization of diverse neural networks and relevant datasets, quantifies computational performance and energy behavior through inference latency, throughput, and energy/per inference measurements. Across the evaluated network–board pairs, the measured inference power spans several orders of magnitude, ranging from 0.1–10 mW for ultra-low-power Intelligent Sensor Processing Units (ISPUs) up to 1–10 W for embedded GPUs, highlighting the wide design space between the least and most power-demanding configurations. Results indicate that embedded GPUs provide a favorable performance-to-power ratio for computationally intensive workloads, while MCU/ISPU-class solutions, despite throughput limitations, offer compelling advantages in ultra-low-power scenarios when combined with quantization and pruning, making them well-suited for distributed sensing and actuation typical of smart city deployments. Overall, this comparative analysis guides hardware selection for heterogeneous, sustainable AI-enabled urban services.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bramante et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: