PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology2 citationsOpen Access

A closer look at the innovator: The interplay between divergent and convergent processes of self‐regulation

View Full Paper
RBRonald BledowHEHye‐Jung EunLVLien Vossaert

Key Points

  • To explore how divergent and convergent self-regulation processes affect creative performance in innovation projects.
  • Analyzed data from 200 innovation projects involving 104 employee-manager dyads.
  • Used multilevel modelling to assess variability in managerial ratings of creative performance.
  • Examined the relationships between exploration orientation, iteration, outcome focus, and planning.
  • Divergent exploration orientation positively relates to creative performance.
  • Iteration mediates the relationship between exploration orientation and creative performance.
  • Outcome focus moderates the positive relationship, enhancing persistence towards goals.
  • Planning incrementally predicts higher creative performance.

Abstract

Abstract Creativity and innovation are essential for modern organizations. While abundant research has helped to better understand creativity in everyday work life, considerably less attention has been paid to how individuals achieve creative performance during the implementation of innovation projects. We articulate a dialectical interplay between divergent and convergent processes of self‐regulation that supports creative performance in innovation projects. We propose that a divergent exploration orientation contributes to creative performance by inducing a broad search for novelty and by stimulating iteration—repeated cycles of experimentation and refinement. Convergent processes of self‐regulation—outcome focus and planning—strengthen the relationship between divergent processes and creative performance. Specifically, an outcome focus ensures focused exploration and persistent goal‐striving, while planning provides the structure that directs iterative efforts towards innovation goals. To test our hypotheses, we collected information about 200 innovation projects from 104 employee–manager dyads. Multilevel modelling was used to examine within‐ and between‐person variability in managerial ratings of project‐specific creative performance. Employees' exploration orientation was positively related to their creative performance. This relationship was mediated by iteration and moderated by outcome focus. Planning incrementally predicted creative performance. We discuss implications of our study for effective innovation management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bledow et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af956970916d39fea4cecehttps://doi.org/10.1111/joop.70102
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper