This research develops a hybrid model that predicts cooling capacity in refrigeration systems, indicating improved accuracy and efficiency.
• Neural network models electronic expansion valve throttling from six inputs. • Physics–neural hybrid model is built for a direct-expansion refrigeration system. • Valve model reaches 1.14% mean relative error, with <4.5% maximum error. • External test gives 1.39% mean relative error, with ≤5% maximum error. • Hybrid model predicts cooling capacity and sensible heat ratio within ±7%. Accurate modeling of direct expansion (DX) refrigeration systems is critical for optimizing energy efficiency, control performance, and system design. Traditional physics-based models, although grounded in thermodynamics, often fail to capture the nonlinear behaviors of complex components such as the electronic expansion valve (EEV), while purely data-driven models lack interpretability and generalizability. To address these limitations, this study developed a hybrid modeling framework that integrated physics-based formulations with an artificial neural network (ANN). The ANN component modeled the EEV’s nonlinear throttling behavior, whereas the compressor, condenser, and evaporator were represented by validated physical sub-models. The hybrid model was trained and validated using high-resolution experimental data from a variable-speed DX test rig and was further assessed with external datasets for generalization. Results showed that the ANN-based EEV model achieved a mean relative error below 5%, and the integrated hybrid model predicted system cooling capacity and sensible heat ratio with overall errors within ±6%, representing an approximately 50% improvement in accuracy compared with conventional physics-based models. This hybrid framework effectively combines physical interpretability with data-driven flexibility, providing a robust and scalable basis for applications in performance prediction, model predictive control, and intelligent fault diagnosis of refrigeration systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: