PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026Discover Oncology3 citationsOpen Access

The role of hematological biomarkers as diagnostic tool in pre-cancerous patients

BMBefikad MandefroBABedasa AddisuAKAmanuel Kelem

Key Points

  • This review aims to evaluate how hematological biomarkers can serve as non-invasive indicators for early detection of pre-cancerous states.
  • Conducted a narrative review of literature across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science.
  • Analyzed diagnostic performance of several blood tests, focusing on their role in pre-cancerous conditions.
  • Synthesized data on sensitivity, specificity, and AUC for biomarkers like NLR, PLR, and RDW.
  • Hematological biomarkers show potential for identifying early changes in pre-cancerous states.
  • Single biomarkers often suffer from specificity issues due to inflammation overlap.
  • Multi-biomarker panels and tools like PIT improve prognostic accuracy over single cutoffs.

Abstract

This narrative review systematically assesses the diagnostic performance of hematological biomarkers as non-invasive markers for early identification of pre-cancerous states. Employing a comprehensive search across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, it examines how persistent inflammation in the premalignant microenvironment induces detectable systemic changes through standard blood tests, such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and red cell distribution width (RDW). In contrast to prior reviews emphasizing established cancers, this synthesis focuses on premalignant conditions like oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs), cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), and Barrett’s esophagus, incorporating available sensitivity, specificity, and AUC data. Although these markers are highly accessible, their specificity is frequently compromised by overlapping inflammatory conditions. Thus, combining complete blood count (CBC) elements into multi-biomarker panels or using dynamic tools like the Personalized Indicator of Thrombocytosis (PIT) for serial tracking yields better prognostic accuracy than single cutoffs. The review also explores enhancements via machine learning models and molecular add-ons, such as cell-free DNA (cfDNA), for improved risk assessment. While issues like assay variability and inconsistent reference ranges persist, these blood-based biomarkers offer an affordable, adaptable strategy for surveilling transformation risk. By tackling deployment challenges and common confounders, this work outlines a practical roadmap for leveraging routine hematological indices to boost early detection and patient outcomes in pre-cancerous cohorts, especially in low-resource settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mandefro et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af957570916d39fea4d0fchttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-026-04661-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper