This research demonstrates effective gearbox reconstruction in excavators, indicating improved operational reliability.
The drive of the bucket-wheel on SRs1200 excavators is realized by a 400 kW electric motor and a multi-stage gearbox through which power and torque are transmitted from the drive motor to the bucket-wheel. The gearboxes used on these excavators are of a conventional extended design with parallel shafts and pairs of helical cylindrical gears, equipped with a main and an auxiliary drive. The main drive is used during bucket wheel operation, while the auxiliary drive is applied during overhaul activities and inspection. From the input shaft of the main drive to the output shaft, a four-stage gear transmission is formed. In previous designs, the gear on the output shaft was manufactured by casting, while the gearbox output shaft is hollow, allowing the bucket wheel shaft to be mounted through it. The objective of the research is the implementation of two different methods, one theoretical and one practical, for diagnosing the behavior and vibrations occurring in the drive group, with the aim of determining the most optimal approach to operation, maintenance, and necessary reconstruction of the gearbox. The basic diagnostic parameters are vibration values measured at characteristic locations throughout the drive group and its supporting structure. These measurements show good agreement with a mathematical 3D model developed using the Inventor software package, based on the finite element method, the theory of elasticity, and machine dynamics. Testing was performed prior to installation, followed by inspection after a certain number of operating hours, reconstruction of the gear teeth, and testing after reconstruction. A reduction in drive group vibrations of approximately 30% was achieved. The scientific contribution lies in the potential for future development of gearbox condition analysis models based on measured vibration parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kržanović et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: