Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Unifies definitions of intelligence through coherent navigation in state spaces, highlighting metacognition's role in achieving optimal performance.
Existing definitions of intelligence capture single aspects: problem-solving (psychometrics), prediction (Hutter-Legg), compression (Kolmogorov), adaptation (evolutionary), integration (IIT). This paper unifies them: intelligence is coherent navigation of state spaces. Three components: traversal efficiency (how many states reachable), self-representation accuracy (does the system know where it is), and metacognitive correction (can the system fix its own errors). These map isomorphically to the coherence metric K(t) = ρ · I_Φ · F. The intelligence threshold is K_crit. Below it: drift. Above it: navigation. No existing formal definition includes metacognition — the component that fails first. Intelligence scales with coherent state space accessibility, not substrate size. Computation expands accessible space; coherence determines whether it is navigated or drifted through. Mutual coherence (E > 0) amplifies intelligence beyond individual capacity. AGI is K_total > K_crit across all relevant state spaces — achievable only with external boundary. Part of the Spektre research corpus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lauri Elias Rainio (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: