PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026Journal of Applied Entomology0 citations

Nocturnal and Diurnal Floral Visitors Complement Pollination Services to Pitahaya ( Selenicereus undatus ) in the Yucatan Peninsula of Mexico

View Full Paper
FRFranklin H. RochaCSCelia Isela Selem‐SalasLLLuis Alberto Ancona Lizarraga

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare the pollination contributions of nocturnal and diurnal floral visitors to pitahaya crops.
  • Quantified the abundance of nocturnal and diurnal visitors in a pitahaya plantation.
  • Conducted controlled floral access experiments to assess impacts on fruit quality and quantity.
  • Estimated overall pollination service provision (PSP) for pitahaya.
  • Diurnal visitors significantly outnumbered nocturnal visitors.
  • Diurnal visitors improved fruit set to 95.6% compared to 75.6% for nocturnal visitors.
  • Seed number was higher in diurnal visitors (3543 seeds) than nocturnal ones (2373 seeds).
  • Pollination service provision was substantially greater for diurnal visitors (0.90) than nocturnal visitors (0.22).

Abstract

ABSTRACT The pitahaya ( Selenicereus undatus ), a night‐blooming cactus with edible fruit, has been cultivated for centuries in the Yucatan Peninsula, one of the main regions of production in Mexico and globally. Although pitahaya flowers are mostly receptive at night, stigma receptivity extends into the morning, attracting numerous insect visitors. This study compared the overall contributions of nocturnal (N) and diurnal (D) floral visitors to pitahaya pollination. We quantified the abundance of both groups over one plantation and conducted controlled floral access experiments to compare their effects on fruit quantity and quality, to estimate the overall pollination service provision (PSP) to the crop. D visitors were significantly more abundant than N ones. The beetle Carpophilus sp. was the predominant visitor recorded throughout the study period, followed by Africanised Apis mellifera , which predominated among D visitors. Controlled experiments showed that D visitors significantly improved fruit set (95.6%), seed number (3543 ± 219), and fruit weight (309 ± 14 g) compared to N visitors (75.6%; 2373 ± 297 seeds; 228 ± 17 g). D visitors provided substantially higher pollination service (Spear's index = 0.90) than N ones (0.22). The overall PSP was 0.56, confirming a pollination deficit due to insufficient N pollination. Our results show that the diurnal insect community, particularly Africanised honey bees, play an important role in providing complementary pollination services to pitahaya crops. These findings should be considered to implement management strategies to improve pollination and productivity of this economically important crop in Mexico.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rocha et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af959570916d39fea4d3echttps://doi.org/10.1111/jen.70084
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper