Experimental and numerical investigation improves stability in embankment slopes using different reinforcements, indicating effective design strategies.
Reinforced soil technology is widely applied in slope stabilization, yet the optimal configuration of reinforcement remains a key design challenge. This study presents a comprehensive investigation of vertical rib‐reinforced and inclined‐reinforced geogrid layouts through scaled physical model tests (1:10) and finite element simulations using MIDAS GTS. Results show that (1) vertical rib reinforcement improves ultimate bearing capacity by 24.6% and reduces settlement by 45.4%, outperforming ordinary horizontal reinforcement (18.1% capacity increase); (2) inclined reinforcement at a 5° angle further enhances performance, achieving a 31.8% increase in bearing capacity and a 57.8% reduction in settlement; (3) numerical simulations reproduce experimental trends with minor displacement underestimation, attributed to idealized soil–geogrid interfaces. This study provides the first integrated comparison of vertical rib and inclined reinforcement strategies, establishing a practical and effective design reference for reinforced soil slopes in loess regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: