PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026Oikos0 citations

Spatial heterogeneity modulates dispersal effects on metapopulation abundance: insights from a graphical approach

View Full Paper
DWDanping WuPeking UniversityYYYue YuPeking UniversityMLMingyu LuoUniversity of California, Los Angeles

Key Points

  • The aim is to understand how dispersal affects metapopulation dynamics in relation to spatial heterogeneity.
  • Utilized a graphical approach to illustrate dispersal-abundance relationships.
  • Applied logistic growth models to analyze varying effects of dispersal rates.
  • Examined consumer-resource systems with type I and II functional responses.
  • Dispersal-abundance relationships shifted from monotonic decrease to increase with productivity.
  • Consumer dispersal initially decreased resource abundance, followed by an increase at higher dispersal rates.
  • Spatial heterogeneities significantly mediate the effects of dispersal on abundance.

Abstract

Understanding the effects of dispersal on metapopulation dynamics is crucial for assessing the impacts of habitat fragmentation and informing effective conservation strategies. However, previous theories have primarily focused on the effects of extremely low or high dispersal rates due to their mathematical tractability. In this study, we use a graphical approach to intuitively illustrate how dispersal–abundance relationships vary across scenarios of spatial heterogeneity. In logistic growth models, we show that as the intrinsic growth rate in the more productive patch increases, the dispersal–abundance relationship transitions sequentially from a monotonic decrease, to a hump‐shaped curve, and eventually to a monotonic increase. In consumer–resource systems with type I or II functional responses, consumer dispersal can either increase or decrease the total consumer abundance compared to isolated cases. As consumer dispersal rate increases, resource abundance first declines but then increases. These context‐dependent effects of dispersal can be understood from a general framework based on local recovery rates of subpopulations near equilibrium. These findings underscore the central role of spatial heterogeneities in mediating the effects of dispersal on metapopulation abundance, offering insights for conservation management strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af95a470916d39fea4d650https://doi.org/10.1002/oik.12099
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper