PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026Wildlife Society Bulletin0 citationsOpen Access

Beyond discrete visibility estimates: single‐scan LiDAR provides an efficient method for 3D viewshed estimation

View Full Paper
RSRachel M. SteinCACory R AllredBLBastien Lecigne

Key Points

  • This research aims to improve methods for estimating 3D visibility in wildlife habitats using single-scan LiDAR.
  • Compared segmented 3D viewsheds from single scans of terrestrial laser scanners with profile board methods.
  • Gathered data from 25 forest plots at varying animal eye heights (25 cm, 75 cm, 155 cm).
  • Evaluated the efficiency and comprehensiveness of the viewshed estimates from both methods.
  • Visibility estimates increased with eye height but showed no significant difference between the two methods (P = 0.501).
  • Profile boards provided limited visibility information compared to the comprehensive data from single-scan LiDAR.
  • Single-scan LiDAR proved efficient for collecting fine-scale 3D visibility data in natural habitats.

Abstract

Abstract For many animals, visual information is crucial for detecting mates, competitors, and predators, selecting and defending territories, and finding resources. Established field methods for estimating visibility, such as use of profile boards, produce estimates constrained to a limited set of directions and distances that do not account for the continuous and multidirectional nature of visual information. The limitations of profile boards have recently been overcome by estimating visibility from terrestrial lidar data; however, gathering data requires intensive field efforts and data processing that limits application to studies of free‐ranging animals. Our goal was to demonstrate an approach for estimating fine‐scale, 3‐dimensional (3D) visibility in the field based on single scans from a terrestrial laser scanner and to compare results with the profile board method. We gathered data from 25 forest plots from 3 vantage points representing different animal eye heights (25 cm, 75 cm, and 155 cm) using 2 methods: 1) segmented 3D viewsheds estimated using single scans from terrestrial laser scanners (ssTLS) and 2) profile boards. Estimates of visibility increased with eye height but did not differ significantly ( P = 0.501) between methods when the viewsheds were segmented to the region of the profile boards. However, the profile boards could not provide the comprehensive and flexible information associated with viewsheds. We demonstrated how single‐scan viewsheds can be segmented to characterize ecologically relevant portions of spherical viewsheds and provide a comparison of the 2 methods. The ssTLS approach is an efficient method for collecting fine‐scale information on viewsheds in the field that can produce comprehensive estimates of 3D visibility, advancing the assessment of a key but often overlooked property of wildlife habitat measurement.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stein et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af95a470916d39fea4d68bhttps://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.70014
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Vegetation and vantage point influence visibility across diverse ecosystems: Implications for animal ecology2022 · 16 citations
  2. 2Long-range visibility of greater sage grouse leks: a GIS-based analysis2004 · 50 citations
  3. 3Avoiding Intraguild Competition: Leopard Feeding Ecology and Prey Caching in Northern Botswana2015 · 38 citations
  4. 4Risk management in optimal foragers: the effect of sightlines and predator type on patch use, time allocation, and vigilance in gerbils2011 · 133 citations
  5. 5Visual Acuity and the Evolution of Signals2018 · 304 citations