PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026Socio-Economic Review4 citations

The paradox of inequality that isn’t: rising economic inequality depresses and polarizes citizens’ belief in meritocracy

View Full Paper
SESven EhmesMGMarkus Gangl

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore the relationship between rising economic inequality and citizens' belief in meritocracy in advanced democracies.
  • Analyzed three decades of survey data from 39 advanced capitalist democracies.
  • Examined the relationship between income inequality and perceptions of meritocracy.
  • Investigated within-country changes over time to assess belief shifts.
  • Found a negative effect of inequality on meritocratic beliefs across countries.
  • Identified an increase in skepticism towards meritocratic realities as inequality rises.
  • Results indicate that growing inequality undermines trust in fairness and polarizes beliefs.

Abstract

Abstract This study examines how rising income inequality has been impacting individuals’ belief in merit-based success, using three decades of survey data from 39 advanced capitalist democracies. Challenging the seminal finding of a “paradox of inequality,” we find no evidence of a positive effect of inequality on meritocratic beliefs across countries. Instead, we identify a substantively moderate but robustly negative effect of inequality on perceptions of meritocracy from within-country changes over time: as inequality rises, citizens’ belief in meritocracy declines. We further uncover that inequality does not merely induce a mean shift, but affects the shape of the distribution of meritocracy beliefs insofar as we find the proportion of skeptical perceptions of meritocratic realities to be increasing with higher levels of inequality. Our findings thus suggest that growing inequality undermines citizens’ trust in procedural fairness and contributes to an increased polarization of attitudes and beliefs at the heart of open societies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ehmes et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af95c070916d39fea4d9f4https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwag016
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Does Inequality Blur Class Lines? Meritocratic Attitudes in Comparative Perspective2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2Effort versus Advantage: Visualizing (Relative) Belief in Meritocracy, 1930 to 2022—A Comment on Mijs (2018)2026
  3. 3Meritocracy and Inequality in South Africa: Understanding Changes in Beliefs and their Influence on Demand for Redistribution2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4Meritocracy Beliefs Are Positively Related to Institutional Trust Only in Societies With Many Economic Freedoms: A Multi‐Society Multi‐Level Analysis2025
  5. 5The Role of Meritocracy in Support for Democracy: Evidence from Cross-National Data2025