Key result
Scientific mentorship is linked to a ~3-fold higher publication rate for cardiology theses.
Observational (n=111)
No
Odds Ratio: 3.021 (95% CI 1.06–10.14)
p-value: p=0.082
A 32% publication rate was observed for cardiology theses in a Tunisian medical faculty, with prospective design, mentorship, and writing quality identified as key predictors of publication success.
Supports targeted training in prospective design and scientific writing for cardiology trainees; leaves open whether interventions raise publication rates.
INTRODUCTION: The benchmark of a medical thesis' success is often its acceptance for publication in an indexed journal. AIM: To determine the publication rate of practice theses in the field of Cardiology at the Faculty of Medicine of Sousse (FMSo) in Tunisia and to identify predictive factors for successful publication. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive bibliometric analysis of Cardiology theses defended at FMSo from 2000 to 2019. Data were extracted from the theses' cover pages, abstracts, and conclusions. The publication status was ascertained via searches in "MEDLINE", "Scopus", and "Google Scholar". Predictive factors for publication were identified using multivariate analysis with a 90% Confidence Interval (CI). RESULTS: Of the 111 Cardiology theses defended at FMSo between 2000 and 2019, 36 were published yielding 42 scientific articles (publication rate of 32%). Notably, 86% of these articles were indexed in "MEDLINE" and/or "Scopus". In 79% of cases, doctoral candidates were co-authors of the resultant publications. Publication was significantly influenced by three factors: scientific mentorship by an Assistant or Associate Professor (aOR=3.021; 90%CI: 1.06-10.14; p=0.082), a prospective study design (aOR=2.536; 90%CI: 1.07-6.02; p=0.076), and a satisfactory quality of writing (aOR=2.384; 90%CI: 1.11-5.11; p=0.061). CONCLUSION: The publication of Cardiology theses at FMSo was found to be associated with the prospective design of the study and the quality of writing. Thus, it is imperative to enhance the research methodology and scientific communication skills of medical thesis candidates and their mentors to facilitate the transition from academic dissertations to medical articles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yahia et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Cardiology theses (n=111). Scientific mentorship by an Assistant or Associate Professor was evaluated on Successful publication in an indexed journal (aOR 3.021, 95% CI 1.06-10.14, p=0.082). Among 111 cardiology theses, 32% were published, with publication significantly predicted by scientific mentorship (aOR 3.021), prospective design (aOR 2.536), and writing quality (aOR 2.384).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: