Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rhetorical critical discourse analysis examines incel discourse in Turkey, revealing gender grievances and justification for misogyny.
This research employs rhetorical critical discourse analysis (CDA) to examine incel (involuntary celibate) discourse on Ekşi Sözlük, exploring how gendered grievances are constructed within a non-Anglophone digital space. Drawing on a corpus of 250 entries (40,000 words) posted between January 2023 and January 2025, the research synthesizes Aristotelian rhetorical modes (ethos, pathos, logos) with critical discourse studies. Findings reveal that users establish ethos through narratives of victimhood, evoke pathos through dehumanizing language, and utilize pseudo-scientific logos to justify misogyny. While inspired by the global manosphere, Turkish incel discourse is uniquely shaped by domestic religious, nationalist, and anti-feminist trajectories. Hate speech is further legitimized through humor, intellectualization, and social critique afforded by the platform’s anonymity. By investigating these everyday communication practices in a Turkish context, this study fills a significant gap in non-Western digital gender studies and provides a context-sensitive framework for understanding the translatability of online misogyny.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nehir Devrim Eserol (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: