Key result
Hybrid VGG-RF model identifies vulnerable carotid plaques on dual-modal dual-view ultrasound with ~0.91 AUC.
Why the study?
Ultrasound imaging is ideal for regular carotid plaque screening, but no existing study leverages multi-modal multi-view ultrasound imaging for AI-enabled auto-classification of carotid plaque vulnerability.
Does a dual-modal dual-view hybrid deep learning-machine learning framework accurately predict carotid plaque vulnerability in patients undergoing ultrasound imaging?
Does a dual-modal dual-view hybrid deep learning-machine learning framework accurately predict carotid plaque vulnerability in patients undergoing ultrasound imaging?
A hybrid deep learning-machine learning model using dual-modal, dual-view ultrasound imaging accurately identifies vulnerable carotid plaques, potentially aiding in stroke risk stratification.
May enhance stroke risk stratification via carotid ultrasound; extends conventional imaging with hybrid AI models.
Background: Ultrasound imaging is an ideal tool for regular carotid plaque screening to identify individuals at high risk of stroke for clinical intervention. However, no existing study leverages multi-modal multi-view ultrasound imaging for AI-enabled auto-classification of carotid plaque vulnerability. This study aims to develop and validate an effective AI model for carotid plaque vulnerability classification through the applications of dual-modal (B-Mode and contrast-enhanced mode) dual-view (longitudinal and cross-sectional) settings to maximize the utility and potential of ultrasound imaging. Methods: Hybrid deep-learning (DL) and machine-learning (ML) methods were employed to balance between model discriminability and interpretability. B-Mode ultrasound (BMUS) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) images from 241 patients were retrospectively analyzed using the proposed hybrid-DL-ML variants. Results: Our findings suggest the hybrid VGG-RF model developed from a dual-modal dual-view setting outperforms those developed from other settings for identifying vulnerable carotid plaques. The VGG-RF model emerged as the best-performing model, achieving an optimal performance with an AUC of 0.908, precision of 0.765, recall of 0.929, specificity of 0.886, and F1 score of 0.839. The inherent interpretability of the VGG-RF model divulged that long-axis views of BMUS and CEUS images were the major contributing features for discriminating vulnerable carotid plaques against their counterparts. Conclusions: The present study underscored the effectiveness of AI models developed from dual-modal dual-view settings of ultrasound images. Notably, the hybrid VGG-RF model was benchmarked as the best-performing model among other studied hybrid DL-ML variants. Further studies on a larger cohort in a prospective setting are warranted to validate the findings of the current study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question. The hybrid VGG-RF model achieved an AUC of 0.908 for identifying vulnerable carotid plaques using dual-modal dual-view ultrasound imaging.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: