Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This evaluation ranks ecotourism experience quality in national forest parks, indicating areas for sustainable management improvements.
Forest parks are expected to balance ecological protection with high-quality ecotourism experiences, yet quantitative, multi-dimensional assessments at the regional scale remain limited. This study evaluates ecotourism experience quality across 37 national forest parks in Shaanxi Province, China, using a five-dimensional, 32-indicator framework (science popularization, landscape esthetics, ecological resources, cultural resources, and supporting conditions). Indicator weights were elicited through the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP), and park performance was ranked via TOPSIS; key constraints were diagnosed using an obstacle degree model. Results show that landscape esthetics received the highest criterion weight (0.245), followed by ecological resources (0.215) and supporting conditions (0.195). The mean experience score across parks was 0.559, with high-quality parks concentrated in the Guanzhong region. Obstacle analysis indicates that insufficient cultural resource protection and interpretation, inadequate public service facilities, and weak science-education functions are the most persistent barriers to improving experience quality. The proposed FAHP–TOPSIS–obstacle framework supports benchmarking and priority setting for sustainable management and targeted investments in forest parks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: