This review analyzes explainable deep learning methods for improving intrusion detection in SDN, suggesting key advancements for implementation.
Software-Defined Networking (SDN) centralizes policy and programmability, while simultaneously concentrating risk in the controller. Deep Learning (DL) has advanced network intrusion detection systems (IDS) beyond rule-based and shallow methods; however, opaque model decisions limit adoption in high-stakes control planes. We review deep learning architectures, including convolutional, recurrent, Transformer, and hybrid models. We analyze performance on canonical datasets (CICIDS2017, UNSW-NB15, CSE-CICIDS2018, ToN_IoT), discuss controller-aware metrics (latency, throughput, rule-install delay), and synthesize deployment lessons from testbeds. We find that Transformers and hybrids often exceed 99% accuracy, while post-hoc XAI provides actionable transparency with modest overhead. “Key gaps identified are, offlineonly evaluation, missing controller latency reporting, and limited in-loop explanations. We outline a practical roadmap toward real-time, explainable SDN IDS: efficient attention, standardized SDN–XAI benchmarks, and human-centered validation. Keywords Software-Defined Networking, Intrusion Detection System, Deep Learning, Explainable AI, CNN, LSTM, Transformer, SHAP, LIME.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jayasena et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: