PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 12, 2026Journal of Marine Science and Engineering0 citationsOpen Access

Bumpless Multi-Mode Control Allocation for Over-Actuated AUV Docking

View Full Paper
PGPeiyan GaoYLYiping LiGXGaopeng Xu

Key Points

  • The research aims to develop a unified framework for control allocation in over-actuated AUVs during docking missions.
  • Developed a framework for mode management and control allocation using SQP.
  • Mode-dependent controlled wrench is modeled from actuator models.
  • Introduced a continuous transition factor to reduce switching transients.
  • Applied integrator alignment resets at switching moments.
  • Integrated the framework into MOOS-IvP with adaptive guidance and control.
  • Reduced roll transients during reverse-to-hover transitions.
  • Improved depth station keeping in hover mode.
  • Maintained actuator commands within feasible limits under constraints.

Abstract

This paper addresses the multi-phase homing and docking missions of over-actuated autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs), where switching among forward cruising, reverse braking, and hovering can induce actuator saturation, rate limit violations, and undesirable transients. We propose a unified framework that couples supervisory mode management with mode-driven constrained control allocation solved by a warm-started sequential quadratic programming (SQP) routine. The controllable wrench is modeled by a mode-dependent differentiable map constructed from the actuator models, and the allocator enforces amplitude bounds and per-cycle increment limits while trading off wrench tracking and actuator usage through mode-scheduled weights. To mitigate switching transients, a continuous transition factor is introduced to interpolate the desired wrench and dominant cost weights, and an integrator alignment reset is applied at switching instants to keep the outer-loop proportional–integral–derivative (PID) output continuous. The allocator is further warm-started by projecting the previous solution onto the post-switch constraint box. The framework is integrated into the Mission-Oriented Operating Suite–Interval Programming (MOOS-IvP) autonomy middleware with adaptive line-of-sight (ALOS) guidance and adaptive PID motion control and is validated on the TS-100 AUV in water tank experiments. Comparative results against a PID-only baseline without control allocation and a variant without bumpless switching show reduced roll transients during the reverse-to-hover transition and improved hover-mode depth station keeping while maintaining feasible actuator commands under constraints.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b2581996eeacc4fcec758chttps://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14050516
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper