Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Formal framework defines governance protocols for autonomous agents, supporting secure coordination and refusal.
This manuscript is Volume IV of The Unified Field Theory of Autonomous Governance, a series formalizing the thermodynamic constraints of artificial intelligence. This manuscript presents a formal framework for trace-representable governance in autonomous agent systems. The paper defines agent constitutions as explicit constraint sets over admissible executions, introduces a secure bilateral handshake protocol for pre-commit validation, and specifies safe refusal semantics as a first-class terminal outcome rather than an exception path. The framework is designed to support policy-constrained coordination, provenance-preserving commitments, and auditable refusal under explicit assumptions about authentication, policy evaluation, and trace observability. Version 2 substantially revises and matures the earlier manuscript by narrowing the contribution to a refereeable protocol paper, replacing broader manifesto-style framing with a formal model, protocol state machine, theorem-style guarantees, and a prototype evaluation design. The manuscript also expands its related-work positioning across formal methods, secure protocols, runtime verification, and multi-agent governance. This Zenodo record contains the Version 2 manuscript source and compiled manuscript files for archival citation and versioned reference.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matthew A. Davis (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: