Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates the impact of price-volatility cojumps on forecasting volatility, implying enhanced predictive accuracy.
This paper investigates whether simultaneous jumps in prices and volatility improve volatility forecasting. Using up‐to‐date high‐frequency S&P 500 and VIX data, we identify price‐volatility cojumps at the intraday granularity and construct upside, downside, and asymmetric measures. Embedding these into the Heterogeneous Autoregressive (HAR) model, we provide new empirical evidence that downside cojumps increase future volatility, upside cojumps reduce volatility. Out‐of‐sample analysis further shows that incorporating these impacts of cojumps significantly enhances HAR model forecasting performance. Moreover, our results reveal that recent price jumps become important predictors of volatility when accompanied by simultaneous volatility jumps, an effect not previously documented in the literature. Finally, we also document the economic interpretation, policy implications, and economic value of price‐volatility cojumps.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kefu Liao (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: