Open-label Phase Ib study evaluates SEL and VEN combination, showing moderate activity in R/R AML, indicating potential for future therapies.
Preclinical studies showed a synergistic antileukemia activity with combination of selective XPO1 inhibitor selinexor (SEL) and venetoclax (VEN), with potential to overcome VEN resistance by reducing the anti-apoptotic protein MCL1. In an investigator-sponsored, open-label, phase Ib study (NCT03955783), adult patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML) were enrolled. After the dose-escalation phase, SEL 80 mg po weekly plus VEN 400 mg/day following ramp-up was deemed the recommended phase II dose. Responses were assessed with IWG2003 and ELN 2022 criteria. Nineteen patients with R/R AML were enrolled. Median age at enrollment was 67.2 (range, 21.1-83.8) years. Overall, patients received median of 3 (range, 1-5) prior lines of therapy. The most common grade 3-5 treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE) were anemia (39%), neutropenia (33%), febrile neutropenia (28%), and thrombocytopenia (28%). Overall, the response rate with SEL-VEN was 21%. Two (11%) patients, one with prior allo-HSCT and one with prior VEN and both treated with SEL 80 mg/week, experienced complete remissions, with duration of response of 7 and 9.1 months, respectively. After a median follow up of 3.0 (range, 0.6-15.4) months, median event-free survival was 2.4 (95% CI: 1.9-12.1) months and median overall survival was 6.4 (95% CI: 2.5-12.1) months. In conclusion, SEL-VEN was feasible and active in a heavily pretreated AML cohort, with no new toxicity signal, but survival outcomes remained poor. The second-generation XPO1-inhibitor eltanexor, combined with VEN may further improve outcomes in VEN resistant AML in an ongoing study (NCT06399640).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ball et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: