PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 12, 2026Electronics4 citationsOpen Access

Advanced Hardware Security on Embedded Processors: A 2026 Systematic Review

AKAli KiaASAaron W StoreyMIMasudul H. Imtiaz

Key Points

  • This review aims to evaluate recent advances in hardware security for embedded systems, focusing on specific technologies and their applications.
  • Systematic analysis of the peer-reviewed literature from 2020 to 2026.
  • Survey of industry implementations and standardization efforts.
  • Examination of five critical security areas related to embedded hardware.
  • Identified advancements in post-quantum cryptography standards and hardware security primitives.
  • Highlighted commercial progress with over 500 million PUF-enabled devices deployed.
  • Documented gaps in memory overhead for PQC and challenges for TEE developers.

Abstract

The proliferation of Internet of Things (IoT) devices and embedded processors has recently spurred rapid advances in hardware-level security. This paper systematically reviews developments in securing microcontroller units (MCUs) and constrained embedded platforms from 2020 to 2026, a period marked by the finalization of NIST’s post-quantum cryptography standards and accelerated commercial deployment of hardware security primitives. Through analysis of the peer-reviewed literature, industry implementations, and standardization efforts, we survey five critical areas: post-quantum cryptography (PQC) implementations on resource-constrained hardware, physically unclonable functions (PUFs) for device authentication, hardware Roots of Trust and secure boot mechanisms, side-channel attack mitigations, and Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) for microcontroller-class devices. For each domain, we analyze technical mechanisms, deployment constraints (power, memory, cost), security guarantees, and commercial maturity. Our review distinguishes itself through its integration perspective, examining how these primitives must be composed to secure real-world embedded systems, and its emphasis on post-standardization PQC developments. We highlight critical gaps including PQC memory overhead challenges, ML-resistant PUF designs, and TEE developer friction, while documenting commercial progress such as PSA Level 3 certified components and 500+ million PUF-enabled devices deployed. This synthesis provides practitioners with practical guidance for securing the next generation of IoT and embedded systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kia et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b2585696eeacc4fcec7dfdhttps://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15051135
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper