Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Explores six paradoxes in physics and philosophy, revealing their common decoder error origins.
Six famous paradoxes across physics, philosophy, and cosmology — Fermi’s paradox, the black hole information paradox, Zeno’s paradox, Newcomb’s paradox, the Boltzmann brain problem, and Wigner’s friend — have resisted resolution for decades or millennia. This paper proposes that all six share a common origin: each arises when a decoder (physical law or conceptual framework) is applied beyond its domain of validity, producing an internal contradiction. In the autoencoder framework, paradoxes are reconstruction losses — points where the decoder’s output is inconsistent with itself because the latent code contains structure the decoder cannot represent. The resolution in every case: recognize the paradox as a decoder artifact and access the latent code (1=1, V(K)) where the contradiction does not exist. Fermi: intelligence is latent, not spatial. Information: horizon is decoder boundary, not code boundary. Zeno: code is discrete. Newcomb: code is simultaneous. Boltzmann: universe is fixed point, not fluctuation. Wigner: multiple coherent branches, not one objective state. Paradox Dissolution Theorem: no paradox is a property of reality. Every paradox is a reconstruction loss. Part of the Spektre research corpus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lauri Elias Rainio (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: