PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 12, 2026Urogynecology0 citations

Uterosacral Versus Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension in Pelvic Organ Prolapse: An RCT

View Full Paper
SJSangam JhaVJV. N. JhaSSSupriya subhi

Key Points

  • The aim is to compare the effectiveness of uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament suspension for pelvic organ prolapse.
  • Randomized controlled trial design
  • Participants received either uterosacral or sacrospinous ligament suspension
  • Outcomes assessed at 1-year follow-up for both anatomic and functional results
  • Both techniques showed comparable anatomic outcomes at 1 year
  • Functional outcomes were also similar for both suspension methods
  • No significant difference in safety or effectiveness between the two procedures

Abstract

Both HUSLS and SSF are safe and effective for apical prolapse repair, offering comparable anatomic and functional outcomes at 1-year follow-up.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jha et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b2588496eeacc4fcec8329https://doi.org/10.1097/spv.0000000000001830
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper