Interprets governance collapse as a structural admissibility failure in governance systems, suggesting implications for political stability.
This paper interprets governance collapse through the admissibility framework of the Paton System. Governance systems persist only while their governing constraints remain mutually compatible. Political authority, legal legitimacy, resource flows, institutional trust, and operational capacity together form a constraint network that defines the admissible operating region of a governance structure. When incompatibilities accumulate beyond tolerance limits, the system can no longer maintain coherent continuation. Governance collapse therefore represents a structural admissibility failure rather than merely a political or economic disturbance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrew John Paton (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: