Explores Kautilya's influence on modern governance, diplomacy, and judicial principles in India, suggesting its ongoing significance.
This paper explores the enduring relevance of Kautilya’s Arthashastra (4th Century BCE) within the framework of modern Indian governance, diplomacy, and the judicial system. It draws a comparative analysis between ancient Mauryan administration and contemporary Indian polity, highlighting how Kautilya’s vision of a decisive leader correlates with the roles of the President and Prime Minister today. The study emphasizes the transition of the state into a Welfare State (Yogakshema), noting that the Directive Principles of State Policy in the Indian Constitution mirror Kautilya’s mandate to protect the vulnerable. In foreign affairs, the author connects the Mandala Theory and Shadgunya to India’s pragmatic "Realpolitik," specifically regarding relations with China, Pakistan, and the U.S. Furthermore, the paper illustrates how Kautilya’s structured taxation and hierarchical judiciary—distinguishing between civil and criminal matters—laid the foundational logic for India’s current legal architecture, proving that the Arthashastra remains a vital blueprint for effective statecraft.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sumit Kumar Mondal (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: