This review evaluates hydrogen-centric energy systems to enhance grid flexibility and sustainability, indicating significant implications for energy transition.
The escalating integration of variable renewable energy (VRE) necessitates the development of energy systems that can furnish flexibility across a spectrum of temporal scales, ranging from mere seconds to entire seasons, in alignment with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 7, 9, and 13. Hydrogen-centric multi-energy systems (H-MES) fulfill this requirement by facilitating the transformation of surplus renewable electricity into hydrogen, thus enabling long-duration energy storage, followed by its reconversion into electricity, thermal energy, and mobility fuels, all while enhancing grid reliability. This review offers a systematically structured and decision-oriented evaluation of H-MES across four pivotal domains: grid-responsive electrolysis, hydrogen storage technologies, reconversion pathways, and the integration of systems with market participation. The assessment of performance is standardized through the utilization of grid-relevant metrics, thereby facilitating a consistent evaluation of both flexibility and adequacy. A cohesive techno-economic and life-cycle framework is employed that accounts for parasitic losses and the utilization of by-products. Decision-oriented indicators, including Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC), Loss of Load Expectation (LOLE), curtailment absorption, and ₹/MWh-shifted, are introduced to enhance transparency in planning, investment analysis, and the scalable deployment of hydrogen-based energy systems. • Normalized framework links electrolyzer, storage, and reconversion dynamics. • Decision-ready KPIs connect technology, market design, and reliability metrics. • Temporal LCA aligns hydrogen system operations with dispatch and emissions. • Archetype-based synthesis enables bankable hydrogen deployment pathways. • Unified model bridges flexibility, adequacy, and sustainability in high-VRE grids.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baskaran Shanmugam (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: