Comparative evaluation of clotrimazole and nitazoxanide for pancreatic cancer, suggesting clotrimazole's potential as a treatment.
Background: Clotrimazole (CLZ) is an approved antifungal with reported pleiotropic effects. Beyond its antifungal use, CLZ can perturb glycolytic flux and ionic homeostasis, motivating its evaluation as a repurposing candidate in oncology. Objective: We aimed to evaluate CLZ and nitazoxanide (NTZ) as drug repurposing candidates for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in comparison with standard chemotherapeutics gemcitabine (GEM) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Methods: T3M4 PDAC cells were treated (0.1–100 µM; 48–72 h) with 5-FU, GEM, CLZ, and NTZ. Cell viability (MTT) and morphology were assessed, and CLZ-based combinations were analyzed by the Chou–Talalay method. In silico studies provided physicochemical descriptors and ADMET profiles, along with predicted interactions with relevant bioorganic targets (e.g., KCa3.1/KCNN4 ion channels). Results: CLZ produced marked cytotoxicity at 72 h (IC50 ≈ 9 µM) and achieved a greater reduction in cell viability at higher concentrations compared to 5-FU and GEM under identical conditions, whereas NTZ showed modest and inconsistent effects. CLZ combinations with 5-FU or GEM were mainly antagonistic. In silico analyses indicated high membrane permeability and suggested potential interactions with KCa3.1, supporting a hypothesis-generating interpretation of the observed in vitro effects. Conclusions: Within a drug repurposing framework, CLZ exhibited consistent cytotoxic activity as a single agent in a PDAC cell model, whereas NTZ revealed limited effects and CLZ-based combinations were not beneficial under the tested conditions. These findings position CLZ as a monotherapy-oriented repurposing candidate for PDAC and motivate further mechanistic and translational studies to clarify the biological basis of its in vitro activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mendes et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: