Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Archaeological evaluation investigates historical site disturbance and features, indicating modern development risks.
In order to determine the archaeological risk posed by a proposal to develop land at The Royal George PH, 57 High Street, Stagsden Bedfordshire, the Heritage Network was commissioned by the developers to undertake a programme of archaeological evaluation. Four trial trenches were opened across the proposed development area. The investigation showed that the southern side of the site has been subject to post-medieval and modern disturbance. The majority of the dateable features encountered on the site were of the modern period. These include two postholes in Trench 1, cuts [102] and [105], demolition debris and modern disturbance in Trench 2 and the car park surface, contexts (400) and (401) for the former Royal George public house in Trench 4. The remaining features and layers, including cut [303] in Trench 3 and layer (403) in Trench 4 appear to date to the post-medieval period, indicated by the presence of brick fragments in both the upper fill of [303] and in layer (403). Two possible natural features were also observed in Trench 1, cuts [104] and [107]. These are likely to represent root action in the rear garden of the former public house.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Helen Ashworth (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: