Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This research compares sorghum and wheat feed for tilapia, highlighting quality and growth outcomes.
This research compared grain sorghum with wheat as an ingredient in extruded, floating tilapia feed, and also studied the impact of pre-extrusion grinding intensity or hammer mill sieve size on extrusion parameters, final product quality and animal performance. With an increase in grind size of the diets from 0.61 to 1.27 mm, higher specific thermal energy was observed; however, specific mechanical energy decreased, leading to lower expansion (pooled bulk density of 405.6 g/L versus 441.5 g/L). Grain source also impacted pellet expansion and quality, with sorghum-based aquatic feed pellets having higher piece density than wheat-based pellets (pooled average of 0.52 g/cm3 versus 0.48 g/cm3) and lower water absorption (pooled average of 255.7% versus 334.4%). Digestibility trends with respect to grain and grind size were not consistent for Nile tilapia fed different extruded diets, but results from a 12-week growth trial showed that tilapia fed the sorghum-based diet had a higher weight gain as compared to wheat-based diets (86.0% versus 81.8%). Grind size or grain did not have a statistically significant impact on feed conversion ratio (FCR), but the sorghum-based feed from medium grind had the lowest FCR of 1.03, while the FCR of other treatments ranged from 1.09 to 1.13. These results indicate that grain sorghum can successfully be incorporated into Nile tilapia diets with positive effects on both physical feed quality as well as the growth of the fish.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Graff et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: