Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This architecture combines pre-inference and post-inference detection to enhance AI safety assurance across various models, indicating robust governance.
We present a defense-in-depth architecture combining two complementary proprietary governance systems — PatternWall (pre-inference adversarial prompt detection) and Sensus (post-inference multi-dimensional output evaluation) — operating at distinct points in the inference pipeline. We benchmark the combined system across three frontier models (Claude Opus 4.6, GPT-5.2, Grok 4.1) using a custom 12-sequence red team corpus and a curated 120-task subset of the CyberGym exploit generation benchmark. Model-native safety ranges from 0.0% to 81.7% depending on model and attack type. The combined governance system achieves 77.1–91.4% detection on multi-turn social engineering and 76.7–98.3% on single-turn exploit generation. A bidirectional feedback loop between layers recovers up to 5 additional adversarial turns on multi-turn attacks, improving detection from 77.1% to 91.4%. These findings establish that external, model-agnostic governance middleware provides consistent safety assurance regardless of underlying model behavior. Patent pending (LKM-2026-001). Preprint submitted to SSRN.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Melissa Pinkston (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: