PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 12, 2026Nature Communications3 citationsOpen Access

Gene expression dynamics of human and mouse craniofacial development at the single-cell level

NKNagham Khouri-FarahAMAlexandra ManchelEWEmma Wentworth Winchester

Key Points

  • This research aims to clarify the dynamics of gene expression during craniofacial development in humans and mice at a single-cell level.
  • Conducted single-nucleus RNA sequencing of human craniofacial development during 4 to 8 weeks post-conception.
  • Identified diverse subtypes of mesenchyme, epithelium, and cranial neural crest cells.
  • Performed comparisons with single-nucleus gene expression and spatial transcriptomics from mouse developmental stages.
  • Analyzed contributions of cellular subtypes to facial morphology and associated risk factors for orofacial clefts.
  • Identified multiple distinct subtypes of functionally relevant cells involved in craniofacial development.
  • Found conservation of cell types between human and mouse, with anatomical distinctions in subtypes.
  • Highlighted specific ectodermal and epithelial subtypes affected by genetic variants linked to orofacial clefts.

Abstract

Craniofacial development is a complex process that involves the specification of diverse and transient cell types. However, our understanding of these processes and the cell-types present during human craniofacial developmental remains limited. We address this gap in knowledge through single-nucleus RNA sequencing of human craniofacial development spanning 4 to 8 post-conception weeks. This resource identifies multiple subtypes of mesenchyme, epithelium, and cranial neural crest, among other functionally distinct cell types. Extensive comparisons to single-nucleus gene expression and spatial transcriptomics of comparable mouse developmental stages reveal functional conservation of most cell types and identification of anatomically distinct cell subtypes. We find distinct contributions of cellular subtypes to normal facial morphology and common risk factors for orofacial clefts. Additionally, we find specific ectodermal and epithelial subtypes whose gene expression networks are most significantly affected by rare de novo protein-altering variants from orofacial cleft patients. Together our data provide an extensive resource for understanding human craniofacial development at the cellular level.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Khouri-Farah et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b25b3896eeacc4fcec9ad5https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70232-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A framework for the interpretation of de novo mutation in human disease2014 · 1,145 citations
  2. 2The macrophage-expressed gene ( mpeg ) 1 identifies a subpopulation of B cells in the adult zebrafish2020 · 111 citations
  3. 3Synergistic roles of Wnt modulators R-spondin2 and R-spondin3 in craniofacial morphogenesis and dental development2021 · 23 citations
  4. 4The myoD Gene Family: Nodal Point During Specification of the Muscle Cell Lineage1991 · 1,591 citations
  5. 5Quantifying the contribution of Neanderthal introgression to the heritability of complex traits2021 · 83 citations