Introduces a framework explaining how signals influence decision-making within organizations, suggesting a new analytical perspective.
Organizations are traditionally described as structures designed to coordinate tasks and resources. Yet individuals operating within organizations must routinely interpret incomplete or ambiguous information before they can act. This paper introduces the concept of the signal environment to describe organizations as systems that continuously emit informational signals requiring interpretation. Drawing on signaling theory (Spence, 1973), organizational sensemaking (Weick, 1995), and information processing theory (Galbraith, 1973), the study develops a framework for understanding how communicative, environmental, and reputational signals shape decision-making in knowledge work. The paper introduces the concept of signal density and examines how organizational ambiguity generates interpretive labor. The framework proposes that understanding organizations as signal environments provides a new analytical lens for examining cognitive load, decision quality, and organizational coordination. The primary contribution of the paper is to unify several theoretical traditions within a single conceptual structure, identifying organizations as dynamic informational ecosystems in which individuals must continuously construct meaning in order to translate received signals into operational action.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luca Nogarotto (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: